STAGES OF AN UNDERGARDUATE PROGRAM REVIEW The Dean of the Faculty is responsible for coordinating the Program Review.  The administrative offices of the university must be involved in Program ...

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR A PROGRAM REVIEW PANEL The Program Review Panel is established to review, examine, evaluate, comment and report on the quality of the program, and to make recommendations for...

PREPARING THE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT The following are guidelines for preparing for a self-evaluation report: THE EVIDENCE BASE The self-evaluation document should be factual, explicit and should...

PURPOSES OF AN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW A Program Review is designed to contribute to the ongoing processes of assurance and enhancement of quality in the program, its teaching, learning, stude...

DOCUMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE FACULTY REVIEW PANEL TO THE DEAN The Faculty Review Panel is convened, it must provide the following documents to the Dean of the Faculty which is going to be review...

DOCUMENTS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE FACULTY REVIEW PANEL BY THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY The Faculty Review Panel must receive documentation as follows, no less than one month before the visit of the Facult...

BENEFITS OF AN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW A Program Review enables a program and its staff to identify strengths and weaknesses of a program, and to know where to intervene to make effective and ...

WHAT IS AN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW? A Program Review is a rigorous, systematic, objective, impartial, expert-based examination, evaluation and self-evaluation of how effectively a program is w...

STAGES IN A FACULTY REVIEW The Learning and Teaching Committee is responsible for coordinating the Faculty Review. For that part of the Faculty Review that resides within the Faculty, is Dean ...

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR A FACULTY REVIEW PANEL The Faculty Review Panel is established to review, examine, evaluate, comment and report on the quality of the Faculty, and to make recommendations for...